16 December 1998
Tudor offers to shine light on the road ahead
By Mark Nicholas
SYMPTOMATIC of the attitude which separates English cricket from
other countries was the team selection for the Test match which
has been lost too easily here in Adelaide.
Not so much the choice of seven batsmen - though the tendency is
for a No 7 to play like a No 7, which wouldn't matter if he were
Ian Healy - but more the decision to leave out Alex Tudor.
For as long as you like, England have craved a bright light on
the quick-bowler front and the minute one was found, it was
snuffed out. The argument that Australia omitted Jason Gillespie,
their fastest bowler, so it must have been right for England to
omit theirs, doesn't wash. The Australian team are in good shape,
have Glenn McGrath to do their bullying and, anyway, the
replacement for Gillespie, Stuart MacGill, is an attacking
bowler.
The England team are desperate for something a bit different,
someone the Australians aren't sure about, someone to take them
on and upset their rhythm.
It was blindingly obvious that Tudor did this in Perth and to
ignore him in favour of another mediumish-pacer, or yet another
batsman, was crass. It illustrated a misunderstanding of so
many things, which, in turn, explains a lot of the ordinariness
in the English game.
First, who would Australia least like to play against? Tudor, of
course. Second, Tudor is a talented, all-round cricketer who can
bat sensibly, move quickly around the outfield and throw in hard
and fast, and is a fast bowler who, contrary to expectation, does
not spray it about but who bowls a tidy line around off-stump -
fancy the selectors missing that.
Third, what sort of message does this send to young English
cricketers who are busting for the big time? Fourth, what
confusion it must have brought upon Tudor. Fifth, what message
does it send to Australians at large who view this England team
as tactically negative and individually not too talented, and who
thought that Tudor contradicted both? Now, the sixth . . .
Now, six is really important - it is the nub of the thing.
English cricketers are not being allowed to grow up. They are
cosy and spoilt and too many are immature. Little in their
development has been earned and too much is given.
Here was a chance for Tudor to grow up overnight, however
batsman-friendly the Adelaide pitch promised to be. Here was a
chance to give a young English cricketer his head at a time when
he was on a high. Ten days ago Tudor believed in himself
unconditionally, now he will not be quite so sure.
The point is that the moment has gone because the day-to-day
management of the team can't see further than the end of their
noses. Here was a chance to make an impact - and, yes, there was
a degree of risk compared with selecting the more experienced
Dean Headley, say, but the risk was a part of the fascination, a
part of the drama, and no one could see it. They probably don't
understand just how important it is to give English cricket an
injection of adventure.
After he plays in Hobart against a strong Australian second XI,
in an anti-climax of a game, he could be back among the rank and
file. What a waste. And if he plays in the fourth Test in
Melbourne - he will, won't he? - Tudor will be hailed as
England's saviour, which will increase and intensify the
expectation surrounding him. If he fails to pull up trees, the
cynics will ask what the fuss was about. Then we are back to
square one. Such a shame.
Even Alec Stewart, as up-front and optimistic a captain as
England could wish for right now, sounded helpless during his
press conference. He said that England competed fine with
everyone except Australia. No, he added, he couldn't put his
finger on why not.
Leg spin, pace bowling, athleticism, all-round technical skill
and a bold approach are among the reasons. Alex Tudor will help
with a few of these and, in addition, he would give everyone hope
and excitement, thrills which are badly needed if England and all
who follow them are not to go home with their tails between their
legs.
Source :: Electronic Telegraph (https://www.telegraph.co.uk)