Cricinfo

 

Live Scorecards
Fixtures | Results
3D Animation
The Ashes
ICC World Twenty20
ICC Women's World T20
County Cricket
Current and Future Tours
Match/series archive
News
Photos | Wallpapers
IPL Page 2
Cricinfo Magazine
Records
Statsguru
Players/Officials
Grounds
Women's Cricket
ICC
Rankings/Ratings
Wisden Almanack
Games
Fantasy Cricket
Slogout
Daily Newsletter
Toolbar
Widgets




Mon Jan 13 2003
Issue No: 150

India hang tight to pull off thrilling one-wicket win

Sourav Ganguly.s men almost contrived to lose the sixth ODI before eking out a nail-biting one-wicket win with one ball to spare. Chasing 200 to win in 49 overs, the visitors seemed home and dry at 182/3 in the 42nd over. But the loss of Virender Sehwag, who made a chancy 112 off 139 balls, at that stage precipitated a collapse that saw them go into the final over needing four runs with three wickets in hand. In the event, the first two balls yielded one run before further drama unfolded. Kaif (7) fell to the third while Zaheer Khan (0) was run out off the next, a wide. Fortunately for the Indians, the last wicket pair of Javagal Srinath and Ashish Nehra managed to hold their nerves and steer their side home. Earlier, Srinath (10-2-13-3) had bowled outstandingly as India reduced New Zealand to 147/9. But a hard-hitting Shane Bond (31* off 15 balls) in the company of Lou Vincent (53* off 107 balls) helped the hosts recover to 199/9 in their 50 overs. Despite being docked an over for slow over-rate, it was though to prove a total that was within India.s reach on the day.

We should have won the game easily - Ganguly

Indian captain Sourav Ganguly was happy to see his side notch up another win but felt that they injected some unnecessary excitement into a match, which they should have secured easily. .We just left it too late. It is not that we have not been in this situation before - we have experienced a few close games - but we should have won this game easily,. he observed.

Talking about the bowlers, Ganguly said they did a good job for the best part of the New Zealand innings but almost undid it all by conceding 52 runs off 23 balls to the last-wicket pair of Lou Vincent and Shane Bond. "I thought we bowled very well until the last three overs, that doesn't usually happen because Zaheer [Khan] is fantastic at the death," the Indian skipper said. It was an indirect indictment of his own poor bowling that saw him concede 18 runs in his last over, the 49th of the New Zealand innings.

Ganguly also took the opportunity to express his surprise at his side being docked an over for slow over-rate. "We were surprised today to be penalised our overs. We were working through the overs very well because we knew we had to with five seamers. We had to do that and did it right from the start," he said, adding that he thought various stoppages had not been worth the docking penalty.

But that said, the skipper was happy that his side had won two matches in a row at the end of the day. "It was good to get back to the winning streak, but as I said before I kept on losing important tosses (earlier)," he observed.

Hamilton pitch expected to produce high-scoring game

More than three weeks ago, Hamilton's Westpac Park pitch was the source of much criticism after the groundstaff suffered bad weather on the two days before the second Test. But in spite of 163 millilitres of rain falling on the ground last week, the groundstaff are certain they have it right for the final match in the one-day series between New Zealand and India on Tuesday. The pitch will be harder and faster after two days of solid baking in hot sun and with more rolling to be done. Assistant groundsman Daniel Wilson said today the pitch for the game would be more of a batting track and the groundstaff were picking scores of 270-280 for the sides. He confirmed that there would be nothing like the sideways movement there had been in the Test and that it would be the best pitch of the one-day series.

  • Democracy unleashed! Make your selections for the People's XI for the final ODI. Click Here
  • Read New Zealand skipper's Stephen Fleming thoughts ahead of the final ODI against India. Click Here
  • Get all your cricketing questions answered. Just Ask Philip. Click Here

Born on this day in 1948, Kenia Jayantilal went to the West Indies in 1971 as a reserve opening batsman. But with Sunil Gavaskar injured, he played in the first Test at Kingston where his only innings saw him dismissed for five. Gavaskar's return in the next Test and his amazing run of success meant that it was to unfortunately remain Jayantilal's only Test.

A couple of wins in the last two ODIs has lightened the gloom that once shrouded the brows of every Indian player. Sourav Ganguly and his men will now be hoping to add yet another win in the final ODI. Stay with CricInfo.com and find out if they succeed in their quest.

Mail The Editor




Virender Sehwag
Riding his luck
© Reuters

As of Monday, how many more scalps does Srinath need to complete a haul of 300 ODI wickets?

Previous Question

Before Anil Kumble, who was the only Indian to be out hit-wicket in one-day internationals?

Answer:Nayan Mongia



.We had the opportunity to beat them (India) but it slipped through our fingers,. Stephen Fleming

"To all of a sudden think that if we had knocked [Javagal] Srinath over at the end, we'd have won the game. It was amazing to get it to that point,.Chris Harris



.We hope that our esteemed Indian team gets into the habit of tasting success without creating too much of tension and increasing the heart rates of a billion of its fans,. Jayanth Subramaniam V


Javagal Srinath.s spell of 10-2-13-3 was the third most economical spell by an Indian in an ODI, after Bishan Bedi.s 12-8-6-1 in 1975 and Sunil Joshi.s 10-6-6-5 in 1999.

Copyright 2002 CricInfo. All rights reserved. All information displayed on this page (dispatches, photographs, logos), are protected by intellectual property rights owned by CricInfo. As a consequence you may not copy, reproduce, modify, transmit, publish, display or in any way commercially exploit any of the contents of this section without prior written consent of CricInfo.